PRAXIS by TACITUS

How PRAXIS works

PRAXIS is the visible workbench where users ask questions, attach sources, build ContextCapsules, run policy tools, draft memos, and preserve provenance. The surface stays simple: one place to turn a situation, document, or policy question into reviewable work.

ProfilePolicy userRole-aware answers
ContextContextCapsuleReusable cores
SourcesReceiptsDocuments and provenance
OutputMemo or handoverReviewable work
ReadinessVisible gatesSource, time, graph
The app first

From loose question to reusable policy context

A user can begin with a prompt, a source packet, a draft question, or a document. PRAXIS wraps the work in a ContextCapsule, routes it through source, document, graph, and time cores, then uses Ask PRAXIS, tools, and agent workflows to produce a memo, brief, source review, or handover that still carries its evidence trail.

Use it today

Current PRAXIS stays simple: one cockpit, capsule attached, evidence visible.

The current app centers on Home, Capsules, Ask PRAXIS, sources, memos, and receipts. Upstream TACITUS systems and deeper graph or temporal engines are described as integration layers or roadmap lanes when they are not the visible production surface.

Sourceability

Use PRAXIS to inspect whether key claims are supported by attached sources, weakly supported, stale, or missing evidence before a memo becomes export-ready.

Claim-source alignment

Capsules and Ask outputs preserve source ids, previews, gaps, and claim posture so a policy team can separate cited facts from model judgment and user assumptions.

Role capsules

A capsule can carry role, institution, lens, allowed tools, constraints, and output goals so the model answers as a specific policy worker rather than a generic assistant.

Output quality

Memo, brief, talking-point, source review, and handover workflows keep output contracts, caveats, receipts, and next actions attached to the work product.

Thinking devices

ACH, timeline, causal, human-friction, red-team, boardroom, and sourceability devices can be represented as capsule context and routed into the right tool or agent lane.

Human-gated context

A Wikipedia for Agentic Context

ContextCapsules are reusable context objects, not prompts. They preserve the parts of policy work that a capable analyst would normally carry in their head: sources, assumptions, tacit knowledge, reasoning devices, review gates, and allowed agent behavior.

Agents can inherit a capsule safely because claims, sources, memories, and limitations are labeled. The capsule says what is known, what is only remembered, what is stale, what is disputed, and what an agent must stop and hand back for review.

Human review makes truth canonical

AI and Cognee can suggest improvements, recall advisory memory, find source gaps, or draft review cards, but human review decides what becomes canonical in the capsule.

Community capsules stay inspectable

Marketplace and community capsules should be forkable and inspectable, with provenance and review state visible before a team relies on them.

What the capsule carries

The capsule carries source spines, claim ledgers, tacit constraints, output contracts, allowed tools, forbidden actions, review checkpoints, memory receipts, and stale or rejected inferences as labeled context.

Premium web

Premium web is not enabled by default.

PRAXIS can expose a paid source-discovery lane only when the deployment has a configured provider and the user explicitly starts that paid workflow. Until then, public claims stay limited to the wired source receipts, uploaded documents, grounded-search routes, and review gates available in the app.

Research graph

GDELT + Wikidata add advisory entity and media signals.

Research graph is free in v1 for signed-in users. It grounds entities with Wikidata labels, aliases, identifiers, and official links, then checks GDELT DOC/API for media pulse and relationship hints. It never mutates the canonical PRAXIS graph automatically; candidates stay review-gated.

User

The analyst posture, preferences, role, institution, and working assumptions that shape the answer.

Situation

The live policy problem, actors, geography, constraints, stakes, and decision context.

Source

The evidence posture: what is cited, what is missing, what looks weak, and what needs review.

Document

Uploaded files, notes, excerpts, and source packets that should travel with the work.

Graph

Actors, claims, relationships, contradictions, commitments, and typed links that make the work reusable.

Time

Sequence, deadlines, windows, episodes, commitments, and signals that change the answer over time.

Tool

The policy tools, checks, drafts, and specialist routines that can run against the capsule.

Objective

The job to be done: explain, compare, decide, prepare, brief, challenge, or hand over.

Output

The memo, brief, talking points, scenario table, source review, or handover artifact the user needs.

Memory

The durable parts that should survive beyond one chat: decisions, gaps, corrections, and team context.

TACITUS ecosystem

PRAXIS is the workbench. The deeper systems organize what the workbench can use.

DIALECTICA, AGON, and KAIROS should be understood as upstream or intended integration layers where appropriate. PRAXIS is the public policy workspace that turns their structure into user-facing analysis and artifacts.

TACITUS

The broader conflict-intelligence company and ontology stack behind PRAXIS.

PRAXIS

The visible policy workbench that turns structured context into questions, tools, memos, and handovers.

DIALECTICA

The ontology-augmented generation layer for ingestion, typed graphs, provenance, and deterministic reasoning.

AGON

An upstream perception and evidence engine, under development, for actors, claims, contradictions, commitments, friction, and quality gates.

KAIROS

An upstream temporal engine, under development, for event sequence, Allen-style relations, commitments, episodes, and time-aware signals.

TACITUS Ontology

The shared ontology work that helps keep products and research systems aligned around typed concepts.

Community

How users can contribute

The useful unit of contribution is not only code. Better sources, clearer capsule gaps, reviewed graph claims, and repeatable team context all make PRAXIS more useful.

Upload documents and source packets that make a situation easier to verify.
Correct missing capsule fields, weak source claims, or stale assumptions.
Review graph and source claims before they become reusable team context.
Create reusable capsules for recurring regions, actors, disputes, or institutional workflows.
Share product feedback from real policy, diplomacy, research, or briefing work.
Open issues or pull requests in the linked GitHub repositories when the contribution belongs upstream.
Aspirational

What I'd like PRAXIS to support next

The next version should make source-to-capsule saving one click, let teams share and fork capsules, review DIALECTICA graph deltas inside PRAXIS, show AGON and KAIROS evidence cards inside Ask answers, score capsule health, and support collaborative memo review. These are product goals, not a claim that every integration is already fully wired in production.